X-Entertainment.com X-Entertainment.com A Proud UGO Affiliate
My dying wish is for an owl/camel hybrid, which I call camowl.

There’s something in the mist ahhhhh!

With a rare weekend work project taking place early this morning, I stayed at a hotel in the city last night to avoid being late and/or needing to get up three hours earlier just to make it there in time from my humble abode. A cumbersome opening sentence for sure; I'm not too tired to notice it, but I'm definitely too tired to fix it.

Around 11 PM, I checked into the Millennium Hotel, which was adequate but totally not worth the 400 bucks that I've now gotta weasel my way into T&E'ing. Though the room featured a mini-bar, I kind of assumed that 400 bucks would merit a mini-bar stuffed with peanut M&M's and those oh-so-glorious hermetically sealed jars of fashionably shaped pretzels. But there weren't any. I was sad.

I was also sad because the room lacked Internet access, meaning that all of my last minute work preparations had to transpire over my cell phone's poor excuse for a web browser. How could a $400 hotel room not come equipped with that stupid Ethernet cable thing? I started feeling plenty stupid over spending so much money, especially after glancing out the window and spotting the same office I go to multiple times a week not more than two blocks away. Surely it wouldn't have been that hard to make it in on time on a Sunday morning.

Defeated, I perused the hotel's collection of overpriced pay-per-view movies, and after deducing that I didn't want to watch Cloverfield while sitting inside a building that was probably destroyed during the course of it, I settled on The Mist.


And HOLY FUCK, where the hell have I been? I absolutely LOVED this movie. LOVED it! Still...before I continue gushing, I need to come clean and admit that I always love movies when I watch them on pay-per-view from inside hotel rooms. It's one the quirks that makes me me.

For whatever reason, I wrote The Mist off as just another in the long, long line of recent horror movies that carefully treaded the fine line between PG-13 and R, putting mood and music before visceral awesomeness in the name of a suspected broader audience. Or something. I didn't say that too well, but I think you know what I mean. Course, had I bothered to spend more than three seconds drawing that conclusion, I would've realized that The Mist was rated R.

I was under the impression that the movie's titular gimmick would've provided the filmmakers an excuse to avoid showing a lot; instead, it was creature after creature after creature, and every single one of 'em was creepy as shit. I'm tempted to toss in the "literally" descriptor, but then I'd have to justify it with a scary looking photo of a pile of horse mud, and that isn't the kind of Google Image Search that I want to end the weekend with.

The creatures were fashioned without any set pattern or "laws" -- some looked like exaggerated critters of our world, while others were so beyond comprehension that I'm still digging up YouTube videos to figure out what the heck I was watching.

While I'll give most films a passing grade just for the inclusion of weird and wacky monsters, I loved the story, the characters, the pacing, the acting....basically, I loved everything that all of the "External Link" reviewers on IMDB complained about. Maybe that's the aforementioned "pay-per-view in hotel room" nuance acting up, but even as someone who so often utilizes his online voice for nonpartisan opinions that take half-stances at best, I feel perfectly comfortable giving The Mist a solid recommendation.

Oh, and if I was at all on the fence about that, something that happened in the movie's last scene pushed it over the edge. Spoilers ahead...

After Thomas Jane and his ragtag bunch of survivors successfully leave the trappings of the supermarket and drive away with the hopes of escaping the horrible fog and all of its horrible monsters, they run out of gas and determine that there's no avoiding their awful fate.

Just when things couldn't seem more grim, a series of earthquakes sends all eyes about a mile ahead, and then, waaay up to the sky:


After facing a horde of giant spiders, crabs, pterodactyls and locusts, the heroes (or whatever you'd call them in this case) lose whatever small bits of hope they had left as that thing stumbles across the horizon. The six-legged "Impossibly Tall Creature" doesn't attack or anything, but he (she?) seemed to indicate that there would be no happy ending in their immediate future. (No need for me to spoil what happened after this, but I think the scene helped justify it.)

Honestly, that's what I wanted the Cloverfield monster to look like. Something wholly indecipherable, and something that was so beyond being simply "big." In fact, the Impossibly Tall Creature almost looked like an uber version of the Cloverfield monster. It's practically a throwaway scene, too, but it's the kind of visual that sticks with you and takes The Mist from being a worthy watch to something you can't get out of your head for days.

That's the long, messy way of saying: Good movie...go watch it.

Posted by Matt on 04/20/2008. E-mail me!



Discussion Thread: 123 comments

Sorry for the double post but the interesting part about Shawshank is that it’s in the same collection of stories that “The Body” was in (which is what became “Stand By Me). I forget the title of the book, but I have it in my storage area somewhere. I definetly want to read that one as well as see the movie since it’s been so long since I last watched it. I believe another story from that series also was made into a movie but I forget which one.

Chestnuts roasted by BJ @ 04/20/2008 10:32 PM


BJ – Apt Pupil.

Chestnuts roasted by Nigel Chaos @ 04/20/2008 10:38 PM


Cursed double post.. but for those interested.. the book was called Different Seasons

Chestnuts roasted by Nigel Chaos @ 04/20/2008 10:39 PM


Pfffftttt… I’m not afraid of some stupid land-cloud.

Chestnuts roasted by Mystie @ 04/20/2008 10:47 PM


Matt – if you liked the mIST, you will love the DVD…It has 2 versions of the film, the original and a version in BLACK AND WHITE!! It just adds creepiness to the film, and it is much more enjoyable than the color version.

On another note, if you ever trek to the giant Toys R Us in Jersey off exit 13a (next to IKEA), they have all the toys you are looking for (MadBalls, the snot/finger thingy…) and they also have tons of clearence items. You probably know about that store, but just in case you didnt…it blows all other Toys R Us stores out of the water!!!!

Chestnuts roasted by Mike @ 04/20/2008 10:48 PM


Mike, I actually bought the two-disc set late this afternoon! Looks like it’s got a good run of stuff. I’m really curious to see the b/w version. Part of me thinks it will seem a bit gimmicky, but my favorite parts of the film will probably benefit from it since the CG monsters were a little shaky at times.

I’ve only been to that TRU once, but I loved it. It definitely feels “apart” from the rest of the chain. Probably should hit it up again, so thanks for reminding me.

Chestnuts roasted by Matt @ 04/20/2008 10:51 PM


i absolutely heart King. One of my favorite movies ever is IT, it’s one of those movies that you dont think scares you until 5 hours later when you close your eyes and can’t get his face out of your head. With that said, i thought The Mist looked terrible and the sage advice of Matt hath saved me from missing out. thankee!!

Chestnuts roasted by vwarb @ 04/20/2008 10:59 PM


Mother F!

I really need to see “The Mist” if it’s as good as you claim. Actually, I’ve been spoiled, since I’ve owned the cassette dramatization for over a decade. Cassette? Surely I jest!
No. This thing was recorded in Kunzkopf Binaural sound, which creates a 3-D soundscape that must be listened to with headphones to be fully appreciated. Awesome!

Chestnuts roasted by Thorzul @ 04/20/2008 11:02 PM


Nice! That’s also one that I was like “eh” about when it was in theaters, but have since become interested in. I didn’t rent it because the cg looked pretty crap, but if you give it a thumbs up I might still check it out. :D

Chestnuts roasted by Eddie Lightning Frog @ 04/20/2008 11:22 PM


The Green Mile is one of my favorite movies. I think it was brilliantly directed and adapted for the screen. Apparently, the same guy worked on The Mist, which makes me want to see it in spite of the fact that I’m usually not a fan of horror or Stephen King.

Chestnuts roasted by Annette @ 04/20/2008 11:23 PM


I’ll probably see the Mist when it pops up on cable. King is definately hit or miss when it comes to movies. I’ve actually never read one of his books, though.

MUST See:
IT
His two episodes of Tales from the Darkside “Word Processor of the Gods” was one of them.
Shawshank Redemption
The Golden Years- I’m probably the only one who remembers this CBS mini. Haven’t seen this in years. I’m not even sure it’s on DVD, but it is on VHS.
The old Shining, even if King hates it. Never seen the tv remake, though.

Watchable, but nothing special.
Pet Semetary
Thinner
Silver Bullet
Nightmares and Dreamscapes- Since this is an anthology, some tales were GREAT, others were blech.

Unwatchable
Desperation- Boring beyond belief
Night Flyer

Anything not listed I either haven’t seen or have completely forgotten about.

Anyway, I went on a sorta movie spree this weekend. I saw “Forgetting Sarah Marshall” in the theater, and “Ladder 49″ and “Number 23″ on cable. Ladder 49 and Number 23 RULED, but I think I’m the only one who didn’t fall in the love Sarah Marshall (my parents outright hated it, but they both loved 40-Year Old Virgin).

I didn’t hate it. I softly chuckled a few times. But I definately think it’s the weakest of the four Apatow movies. It was also too long.

Chestnuts roasted by JLAJRC @ 04/21/2008 12:20 AM


I’ve seen the remake of the Shining , and let me tell ya , I have NEVER in my life HATED a remake, like I do that one. Give me “Here’s Johnny” any day over that remake thing. I always give remakes a fair chance, but in this case I fall SQAURELY into the the original is infinetly superior crowd. lol

Chestnuts roasted by ULTRAMAN @ 04/21/2008 12:31 AM


Since I have no real background with King (that’s more of my grandma’s territory), and I’m not a horror fan, I’m not going to really add anything except Shawshank Redemption is the only movie adaptation of any of his works I’ve ever seen.

As for Cloverfield…it’s a movie that’s better off seen in a group and not alone. Like Matt and others said, it’s more of an “experience” movie.

And I belive that the movie might be 10x better than it already was if the Monster looked like the Huge Thing from the Mist. When they actually show it, you’re not like “HOLY SHIT, IT’S THE MONSTER!” It’s more like “Oh…it’s the monster.” Definitely anticlimatic.

And for those of you who also say the pic of the toy version…I’ll say that I had the exact same reaction to it when I saw it in the movie. I would totally love a F’ing Huge Mist Monster Toy much more than the Cloverfield one.

Chestnuts roasted by Invader Norbert @ 04/21/2008 12:54 AM


Matt, I can’t believe you’ve been missing out on the awesomeness of this movie until now! Some of us were raving about it back when it came out ;) I bought the collector’s edition a couple of weeks ago and it came with a copy of the novella. I’ve decided it’s one of my top favorite adaptations ever. They took all the best stuff, like the descriptions of the monsters, and tweaked what they needed to for the best effect, like taking the ending up a notch. I have been looking forward to watching the b&w version but I’ve been waiting for the right spooky night.
I actually have some fondness for The Shining miniseries, just because it’s got some cool stuff from the book that didn’t make it into the Kubrick version. Of course, Steven Weber is no Jack Nicholson, but he does an admirable job. Then again Tom Jane isn’t exactly what you think of as an Oscar-caliber actor and he totally kills it in The Mist.

Chestnuts roasted by squee4242 @ 04/21/2008 1:07 AM


Never seen that movie, never even heard of it. I should watch TV more.
And 400 for a hotel for three hours more sleep. Wow. Once I spent about 250 for a hotel that was supposed to be one of the nicest on the west coast. Thing is, if you don’t spring for a suite, and then just get the normal room, the only thing special is the thread count of the sheets. that kinda rhymes and I am trying to figure out a way to phrase it so it does not, but I am too tired.

Chestnuts roasted by kb @ 04/21/2008 1:16 AM


I loved The Mist’s story, and I thought the acting was great. It followed the book really closely and I was quite happy with that.

My only gripe? The CG is absolutely, positively, horrible. The scene with the tentacles in particular is almost laughable. That kinda sucked the wind out of my sails. Still, great flick.

Chestnuts roasted by Steve @ 04/21/2008 1:45 AM


I thought the CGI was really great in Mist. I personally don’t see what’s wrong it. What is it about CGI that makes some people so critical of it ? I know everybody has their own tastes but it justs seems like some people hate the idea of computer effects as a whole. I mean if the graphics looked like they came from a nintendo 64 game , then yeah I could see people havin a problem with them. But complaining about effects just because they came from a computer, that I just don’t understand . Oh well, to each their own I guess. =)

Chestnuts roasted by ULTRAMAN @ 04/21/2008 3:25 AM


Yeah, I just saw this movie today and I actually did like it. I seriously yelled “JESUS FUCK, ABOUT TIME” when a, *ahem* certain character met her end. The ending was wrist-slittingly depressing, though; I think if I were in that guy’s shoes I’d have tried to get myself shot. (Did I avoid any major spoilers? Hope so)

@ULTRAMAN: I think the problem is that CGI is overused nowadays by bad directors who don’t know when leaving something to the imagination is scarier than showing the creature. The Mist actually worked just fine, but I think CGI has a time and a place in films, and some movies would be better served without it. Those of us that complain about too much CGI aren’t mad that it’s CGI, we’re mad because there’s too much being revealed… or something. I’m unbelievably tired, so if that didn’t make any sense whatsoever, that’s why.

Chestnuts roasted by MagicFlyinLemur @ 04/21/2008 3:39 AM


I could see that MagicFlyinLemur.=) I personally need to see something of a creature or the creatures in horror movie because I just feel cheated if I don’t see anything at all. But that’s me. I have a very creative imagination actually I just like actually seein the monster/s better. Overall I think CGI can be really cool , if used in the right places and in the right amounts. It can also be used to make other effects like puppetts and suits look even better. But I think that it’s not needed ALL the time, just some times. =) I think everyone can agree on that.

Chestnuts roasted by ULTRAMAN @ 04/21/2008 4:12 AM


It’s just that bad CGI doesn’t really “blend” with the rest of the scene. At least that’s what usually bothers me about it. For example,Ewan McGregor isn’t even looking at Jar Jar’s face in episode 1,he’s just kind of gesturing in his general direction.
CGI is great when it works,but if it’s off a little,it blows the whole scene,IMO.
Never saw “The Mist”,this is just my general opinion on CGI in movies.

Chestnuts roasted by Kid Nicky @ 04/21/2008 7:48 AM


Yeah, the CGI wasnt great, which is why the s disc super duper edition is awesome. Has a directors cut which is entirly in black and white, there is something about good, creepy, horror movies in black and white. It’s so much more…. Something.

Chestnuts roasted by The Dude @ 04/21/2008 9:01 AM


OK, this is odd that anyone is even talking about Stephen King. Because last night, I had a very vivid dream that King met me after work and we had a drink in a midtown bar at 3:00 A.M. I asked him why he stopped trying, and what was up with that girl who loved Tom Gordon book, and he acknowledged that he was very fortunate to have such a loyal fan base who would stand by him through the ups and downs of his literary career.

This is not the kind of dream I normally have – there were no supernatural elements or anything out of place except Stephen King drinking tequila with me in the middle of the night. I can only assume this is a message from beyond. What can it mean!

Chestnuts roasted by Rev. BackItOnUp @ 04/21/2008 10:18 AM


I am a huge, HUGE King fan, and I have been waiting to see this one. Ironically, it was only Yesterday when I tried to rent it at a place near my new apartment…only to be told that renting required a $25 deposit….and I only had ten bucks. Damn. The Mist went back on the shelf. :(

Chestnuts roasted by Muppet Baby @ 04/21/2008 12:35 PM


Yes, The Mist was awesome! I actually went to see it in a theater (not really into the whole “going to the movies” thing—too expensive, don’t like dealing with people, etc.) and I’m glad I did.

Chestnuts roasted by DarkSideofBrightness @ 04/21/2008 12:49 PM


I made my own version of the Mist :D
http://community.livejournal.com/traveling_pics/427043.html

Chestnuts roasted by yelinna @ 04/21/2008 12:55 PM


Add A New Comment!