Also, I think the name would be someone we haven’t seen yet this year, seeing as they are trying to rationalise an action – they may have killed someone?
Ghosted by Guise @ 12/02/2007 4:03 PM EST
Perhaps :
We had hoped to enlist one who seemed to have the right soul for our cause.
met [obscured] and [she] seemed into it at first, [bitch] bailed. [she] knew too much though. We did what we had to, we did not do it to be evil. We did it so we could continue being right.
Ghosted by Guise @ 12/02/2007 4:06 PM EST
Box has only shown up in a few pictures, and in all of them but one, there is a rabbit.
to nizz, i think it’s just a scanner top, my scanner has the same thing
Ghosted by Graham @ 12/02/2007 4:12 PM EST
Ben, where are you seeing the rabbit?
If it’s the corner window, I think that’s actually one of the flowering window boxes. The windows on the ground floor all have them, and the camera angle puts it in to the picture.
Ghosted by Guise @ 12/02/2007 4:12 PM EST
I too think it’s a scanner.
I think it could be estimated that the biggest red bloch is between 15 and 18 letters.
Ghosted by dohopoki @ 12/02/2007 4:15 PM EST
Guise
Looking at the picture I can see how it looks like a small rabbit peering in the window.
Ghosted by Dan H @ 12/02/2007 4:17 PM EST
Dan, yeah it does…it’s kind of why I keep note of where they are in the house, so that I can work out what might be something innocent, I know that the house in question just has those shapes on that level of the building.
Ghosted by Guise @ 12/02/2007 4:22 PM EST
Guise, thank you for keeping track btw, I go into the discussion late and you really helped me to catch up.
Ghosted by Dan H @ 12/02/2007 4:26 PM EST
Dan, very glad I could help and share. I tend to, um, over-geek sometimes when it comes to documenting events – old habits die hard!
Ghosted by Guise @ 12/02/2007 4:29 PM EST
The first picture is looks an awful lot like the lady bunny with the white sweater and red shirt. In the second pic, that looks like a really small rabbit peering in the upper left corner window. All IMO, of course.
“YOU ARE THE MOTHER OF LIGHT
I AM THE FATHER OF DARKNESS
LET US COME TOGETHER
LET US BE ONE
[red bar]
LIFE… FRO [burned out] HEE
[LI]FE… FRO [burned out] TO THE”
I think we’ll be getting an easter advent calender in 2008.
Ghosted by DrummerJay @ 12/02/2007 4:40 PM EST
Boyah…“You are the mother of light.
I am the father of darkness.
Let us come together.
Let us be one.
Life…return to thee.
Life…bestow to thee.
Life…from me to thee.
Life…from us to thee.
Life…from all to thee.â€
Guise
You are officially my new hero! I would have never have found that.
Ghosted by Dan H @ 12/02/2007 4:51 PM EST
Graham,7 lines beginning with L too.
Ghosted by Guise @ 12/02/2007 4:51 PM EST
dude, resurection spel!
Ghosted by Graham @ 12/02/2007 4:52 PM EST
So somebody is definitely being resurrected. Santa circa 2006, right? The “what” is obvious by now, the “who” is pretty simple, “how” is becoming increasingly clear, but the “why” is pretty vague.
You know what they say Ben, “Fight fire with fire” Who better to take out Lego Santa than the Santa from 2006 thats now on the side of the bunnys.
Ghosted by Dan H @ 12/02/2007 4:55 PM EST
Ben, and unfortunately the “who” got a bit more complex with the initial “N” getting involved making another unknown person…
Ghosted by Guise @ 12/02/2007 4:55 PM EST
Does anyone think the fact that the Lego Advent Calendar is handing out the same gifts as two years ago could possibly be part of this?
Ghosted by dohopoki @ 12/02/2007 4:57 PM EST
Dohopoki, you mean like maybe Matt peeked and it broke his soul in two creating Good Matt who makes calendars and a twisted Evil Matt who plays with our brains like little squidgy rubber fingertip puppets, his mind trapped in a looping “groundhog day” of past calendar updates and the only way his subconscious can join them back together is if he tears everything in his Advent Universe down and rebuilds…like a DC Comics mini-series?
Like that?
Ghosted by Guise @ 12/02/2007 5:05 PM EST
Guise wow, how the heck did you find that?!! Chapeau!
That’s called The Resurrection Spell, so somebody is coming from beyond. Santa Zombie! Oh Yeah.
But who did they try to flip but didn’t?? Maybe Waiterbot (he complains about Christmas being secularized) who tried to take over but in the end became friends with our heroes. Or may be they’re talking about Kuse and his new work, and now him complaining???
Eh, no not quite. More like, the REAL 2007 Lego Calendar isn’t in the hands of who we think it is.
Ghosted by dohopoki @ 12/02/2007 5:09 PM EST
My first guess was Kuse, with him having a new job and now it being revealed that he works with/for the bunnies. I think Waiterbot would be the obvious choice and they wouldn’t go with him. Of course Matt is probably reading all these posts and will pull someone out of the blue just to mess with our heads.
Ghosted by Dan H @ 12/02/2007 5:12 PM EST
Melonian, well, I thought at first it was a reference to something like Winter being all dark, spring being all light and something paganistic…then I just started searching for spells. Google did the work, not me.
Ben, hopefully any explosion is a good one?
Dohopoki…oh…well, yeah, that too…
Ghosted by Guise @ 12/02/2007 5:16 PM EST
Dohopoki
Do you think the bunnies switched Lego calendars? That way the boxes that Knacks opens will be under their control as well as the boxes from this years calendar?
Ghosted by Dan H @ 12/02/2007 5:18 PM EST
SOrry for the DP but thinking about it that would explain the “they have 1 we have 1 2, they have 1 we have 1 2″ Meaning they have a Santa AND an advent calendar.
Ghosted by Dan H @ 12/02/2007 5:22 PM EST
Is anybody else wondering what happened to the 2005 Lego Santa? I find it odd that there has been no mention of him, when practically every other loose end has been brought up…
Ghosted by Vanilla Fire @ 12/02/2007 5:24 PM EST
They’ve pretty consistantly spelled too as 2.
Ghosted by dohopoki @ 12/02/2007 5:24 PM EST
I guess the December 2nd gifts weren’t exactly the same. Oh well.
Ghosted by dohopoki @ 12/02/2007 5:28 PM EST
Oh yeah, I forgot to say I meant to. That bunny in the widnow picture has became 7777.gif but I know last night it was an untitled bitmap.
Ghosted by dohopoki @ 12/02/2007 5:38 PM EST
probably means nothing, but when i searched 7777 in wikipedia, i got “you only live twice” relating to the whole resurection theme
Ghosted by Graham @ 12/02/2007 5:43 PM EST
So anyway, back to my original theory:
All these new revelations came immediately following the 666th post. Should we all take turns and quickly get to 777 or is that cheating?
FM
Ghosted by Fungusmungus @ 12/02/2007 5:49 PM EST
Fungus: Really?
Ghosted by Nizz @ 12/02/2007 5:51 PM EST
Cheating a bit rude.
Ghosted by dohopoki @ 12/02/2007 5:52 PM EST
FM, if we shoot for 7777 instead does that mean we don’t only get hints, but Hssxxlllo pops in personally and tells us to knock it off as Matt only has a finite number of clues?
I wonder how many times the following have gone through Matt’s mind in the last week:
“Wow, where the hell did THAT theory come from?”
“Actually, that’s just a speck of dust on the lens”
“Oh my god, what are they on?”
“No, no, no…think, come on it’s obvious…” (Green Earl, for example)
“Hey, you weren’t meant to get that yet!”
“Don’t these guys have anywhere else to be…?”
“I wonder if they’d notice if I just wing it for a while?”
Ghosted by Guise @ 12/02/2007 6:00 PM EST
It’s my personal theory that some of this has evolved out of us. Like 7777.
Ghosted by dohopoki @ 12/02/2007 6:03 PM EST
guise HA!! I was thinking the same thing.
Is it true that everything really got going today once we hit 666 posts?
I assume every has noticed that an “L” is basically an flipped “7″ (i.e. 7 words starting with L in the incantation) – just an observation.
Ghosted by Nizz @ 12/02/2007 6:03 PM EST
Hmmmm. I’m gonna take a stab at the date on the “Hiccup” note. I’m gonna say that the first number is either a 5 or a 9, and the second is most definitely an 11…
Ghosted by DocDragon @ 12/02/2007 6:04 PM EST
race to 777 for more clues
also i bet matt thinks
“how the hell am i going to read 777 posts”
wasnt i 666, if i was, awesome
This entry was posted
on Tuesday, November 27th, 2007 at 2:15 am
and is filed under General.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
Posted by Matt. 
Ghosted by 
Also, I think the name would be someone we haven’t seen yet this year, seeing as they are trying to rationalise an action – they may have killed someone?